I forgot to mention that I’m running for student government executive president. Apparently I’m down in the “polls” because I have done zero campaigning in the past 48 hours (i.e., passing out confections tethered to fliers listing unlikely goals). I’ve been told I have no name recognition among the first quarters. That’s probably going to be an issue. I’ve been really busy the past few days! Really! These moot court briefs ain’t going to grade themselves, motions needed to be won (I think I won? And I was not eaten), and so on.
Well, tomorrow is probably my last day on student government unless something like this happens:

So with that note of pessimism, I give you my Official SBA Manifesto: Why WK
I viewed student government not as a kind of “political” platform where the goal is maximum name recognition or resume padding. Instead, I came to view it as a quasi-administrative gig. At BLS, student government is a very workmanlike organization with extremely limited powers due to the fact that Baylor is a private and restrictive organization. There’s just not a lot that can be done unilaterally without official approval. It’s extremely frustrating.
Now, part of the reason I’ve thrown my hat into the ring is because, if elected, my goal would be to expand student government’s role at the school beyond mere social planning. That’s a much taller order than what it sounds like because at any step of the way, student government can be told NO and that will be that. There is no board of appeals, there is no alternative route. But I would like to at least try to restructure the student government with the main focus being on creating an active committee, a single point of contact, one that continuously and regularly addresses various issues with administration as part of its job responsibilities.
There is, and probably always will be, a simmering discontent in the student body. I think this is par for the course. It’s difficult to be in the same building 12 hours a day and not start to hate the place. But at BLS, there’s no real valve to release that discontent. As a result, students are often misinformed on why administration has done something; folks then feel powerless because there’s no legitimate avenue to provide even minimal input or feedback. That sounds like candyassed whining, but there is, at the very least, a kernel of legitimacy in that. We do pay a lot (what’s tuition now? $35k a year?). I mean, many of us really are selling ourselves into a modern form of indentured servitude, at least let us have gently risque t-shirts for God’s sake. I digress. Professors/admin, while obviously our superiors, are still rendering a service to us. Within that relationship is a certain reciprocity that is tough to see sometimes because of an atmosphere of submission in many quadrants of life at BLS. You know what that breeds? This comment: “I really wish I hadn’t come to BLS. It’s not worth the suffering.” But “That’s always been the way it is and not everyone feels that way,” is the counterargument. That might have been true, but no longer in the age of the internet, where prospective students get their information about law schools. See e.g. this blog, which gets a ton of hits from Google searches that read “BAYLOR LAW SCHOOL +BLOGS.” Glossy law school mass mailing advertisements may be cool to look at, but I know what was determinative for me when choosing a school was what students thought, not the official marketing campaign. It’s in the best interest of everyone associated with BLS that student morale is monitored and maintained.
I’ve always pictured the role of student government to be the official interface for students and administration. To me, it’s not just about party planning and buying new microwaves for the lounge (although that is an important job). In my view, student government should be union reps for students.
Well, I guess we’ll see about tomorrow.